Socialist Worker

TUC sees confusion at Labour leadership hustings

Issue No. 2219

Some 300 delegates at the TUC came to the penultimate Labour Party leadership hustings on Monday night.

All candidates were to the right of the tone of determination from delegates to resist the Tory attacks.

Each candidate was asked how the cuts could be fought, but no clarity emerged.

Former minister David Miliband, was keen to point out his “credibility”: “We need to elect a leader who can reach out to the public and the party, someone who can unite the party, someone credible.”

He was the only candidate who wouldn’t promise to attend the TUC/Unite rally against the cuts on the eve of the spending review—all he could offer was, “Let’s not get angry, let’s get organised.”

His brother, trade union bureaucracy favourite Ed Milliband, promised a break from New Labour, claiming he was “not the candidate of a New Labour establishment.”

But in stark contrast to the debate on the conference floor, he argued opposition to proposed spending cuts must be “responsible”.

“I am not in favour of civil disobedience,” he said. “I am in favour of lawful action.”

Ed Balls continued his rather hollow tack left on everything but immigration.

He described himself as the “head and heart” candidate and said Labour had to show there was an alternative to “dangerous” cuts.

Andy Burnham has wanted to tack right but the TUC was not the place to do it. So he said Labour could not afford to show it was “in denial” about tackling the deficit, saying Labour had to make the “moral argument”.

Diane Abbott said Labour must “stand side by side” with the union movement against the cuts, which she said were “ideological not inevitable”.

That’s why Socialist Worker calls for a vote for her.

Click here to subscribe to our daily morning email newsletter 'Breakfast in red'

Mobile users! Don't forget to add Socialist Worker to your home screen.