Socialist Worker

1972 - rank and file was the key to winning

by Gerry Kelly
Issue No. 2306

Building workers join a mass rally in Liverpool  (Pic: Socialist Worker archive)

Building workers join a mass rally in Liverpool (Pic: Socialist Worker archive)


The Building Workers Charter had been formed in 1970 and the paper soon had a sale of tens of thousands on the sites, with a much wider circulation.

Its main demands were £1 an hour basic rate, a 35 hour week and the end of the lump.

Its leadership was largely Communist Party (CP), though I and other members of the International Socialists (IS)became involved. The IS were the forerunners of the Socialist Workers Party.

Local groups were set up and its editorial board was composed of delegates from these groups.

The Charter was the major influence in forcing and then spreading the strike. But when the strike got underway the Charter stopped publishing.

There was no national meeting to direct tactics and strategy. There were not even local Charter group meetings during the whole 13 weeks.

Some CP activists, like Pete Carter, Mick Shilvock and Phil Beyer in Birmingham were well to the left and I worked closely with them.

Others almost saw their job as done when the national strike was called.

The CP members initiated several rank and file movements in various unions. When they thought the officials had been “pushed” leftwards, they thought the job was done.

The Building Workers Charter took a similar stance.

So although the strike had been brought about and spread by pressure from below, the means to mobilise independently wasn’t there when the strike was sold out.

Although the IS initiated the Building Worker and tried to organise groups of militants around it, our numbers were few compared to the CP and our influence limited.

With the absence of the Charter, Socialist Worker stepped into the breach.

Specials

It produced several Building Worker Specials.

During the strike many militants, including some in the CP welcomed the SW Building Worker specials as a way of giving strikers a voice independent of the officials.

The failure of the Charter to maintain rank and file organisation during the strike allowed the Ucatt leadership to end the strike when building bosses were on their knees.

The back to work order was announced on television and the organisation to defy it was simply not there.

The 1972 strike is a lesson in how to build a rank file movement, but also in the dangers of allowing such a movement to see its role merely as one of forcing officials to the left.

This approach ultimately disarmed the rank and file instead of empowering it.


A bosses' backlash

After the strike the National Federation of Building Trade Employers, in cahoots with the blacklisting organisation The Economic League, issued a document titled “Violence and Intimidation in the Building Industry Dispute”.

It recounted incidents where violence was supposed to have occurred as well to arrests for peaceful picketing.

The Shrewsbury 24— including Des Warren, Ricky Tomlinson, John Carpenter, John Llywarch—were put on trial for “conspiracy to intimidate”.

In 1973, at Shrewsbury Crown Court, three were jailed on trumped up charges.

A campaign to clear the names of the 24 recently brought the case to the Criminal Cases Review Commission.

There was also a trial in Birmingham of five building workers, including myself, for conspiracy.

All five of us were cleared.

Many workers were blacklisted because of union activities and many of us have now found out that files were kept on us on a database for almost 40 years.


If you enjoy Socialist Worker, please consider giving to our annual appeal to make sure we can maintain and develop our online and print versions of Socialist Worker. Go here for details and to donate.

Article information

Features
Tue 5 Jun 2012, 17:15 BST
Issue No. 2306
Share this article


Related


Tags



Mobile users! Don't forget to add Socialist Worker to your home screen.