Socialist Worker

United Nations bombs are no better for imperial victims

by Sadie Robinson
Issue No. 2369

Many people who oppose a Western attack on Syria feel that intervention would be more legitimate if the United Nations (UN) backed it. The UN was set up after the Second World War to make sure that such a conflict should “never be repeated”. 

It appears to be above national politics because all member countries have a say in the General Assembly. But real power lies with the Security Council. This has five permanent members which can veto decisions—the US, Britain, Russia, France and China—the victorious powers at the end of the war.  It has a history of backing powerful rulers and their wars.

The UN helped to partition Palestine and create the state of Israel. UN “peacekeeping” missions have led to bloodshed and terror—such as in Somalia in 1992. Its “stabilisation” force has occupied Haiti since 2004—and waged war on poor people. Powerful states such as the US can threaten to withhold aid or promise to write off debts to bully other countries into backing them. UN backing will simply give a diplomatic sheen to Western rulers’ imperialist agenda—and help them get away with murder.


If you enjoy Socialist Worker, please consider giving to our annual appeal to make sure we can maintain and develop our online and print versions of Socialist Worker. Go here for details and to donate.

Article information

News
Tue 3 Sep 2013, 18:26 BST
Issue No. 2369
Share this article


Related


Tags



Mobile users! Don't forget to add Socialist Worker to your home screen.