Protests and guerilla tactics —the fight for abortion rights

Posted on: July 1st, 2022 by Sophie No Comments
abortion

An abortion rights protest in Pittsburgh (pic: Mark Dixon on Flickr )

Now the supreme court in the US has ripped up abortion rights, the fight is on to help desperate women end their pregnancies. The pro-choice organisation, The Guttmacher Institute, found that some 2,548 abortions were provided every day in 2020—the last year ­figures were available.

So what happens to those women now? As well as protests against the decision itself, a host of guerilla struggles are taking place. Many women will try to get their hands on what’s known as “medication abortion”.

Abortion pills, most commonly mifepristone and misoprostol, already account for 54 percent of abortions in the US. Most states in the US allow abortion pills to be sent out in the mail, but 19 don’t, as they require a health worker to be there. 

Many US based telehealth services won’t mail the pills to women in states with abortion bans. But some services beyond the US’s legal jurisdiction can post medication to women throughout the states.

For instance, since website Aid Access was set up in 2018, it’s shipped abortion pills to tens of thousands of people from its pharmacy in India. Activists in Mexico have long helped women from the US with abortions—and now they are ­expecting to redouble their efforts.

They’ve been transporting pills over the border in toys, jars of vitamins or sewn into the hems of clothes. For poor women, one of the ­biggest barriers to abortion access is who will pay for the procedure and associated costs such as travel, accommodation and childcare expenses.

Dozens of abortion funds operate like charities to help women pay off these bills. In the “trigger ban” states, some are still operating to help women travel further afield to get the care they need. Others shut up shop abruptly, ­fearing legal repercussions if they were to continue to operate.

Although expected for a long time, the Supreme Court’s ruling on 24 June was instant. So women who were due to receive abortions were turned away from clinic doors. It plunged health workers into a desperate scramble to find options to get women the care they need. 

A group called Elevated Access has chartered volunteer-piloted light ­aircraft to transport women to abortion appointments, sometimes from small rural airstrips. The Just The Pill organisation has bought two vans—one for medication abortions and one for surgical procedures.

“We are undaunted,” said Dr Julie Amaon, director of Just The Pill. “By moving beyond a traditional brick and mortar clinic, our mobile clinics can quickly adapt to the courts, state legislatures, and the markets, going where the need is greatest.

Some are trying legal routes to keep their doors open and keep women out of the backstreets. Mississippi’s only abortion clinic is trying to stop a state law that will make most abortions illegal on 7 July. “We’re not giving up,” said Diane Derzis, clinic owner. “Women have always had abortions, no matter what it took.” 


Democrats encourage passivity as abortion becomes illegal

The Supreme Court made the decisive blow, but blame still lies with the Democrats.  When Roe v Wade was struck down, president Joe Biden offered lukewarm words of objection. Yet he has refused to act in defence of abortion rights.

There are measures the White House could put in place to ease abortion access for women dramatically.  Biden could pass laws to open government-funded clinics along state borders.

He could ensure that telemedicine and abortion pills would be readily available to women, no matter what state they’re in. And he could give clinics permission to open on federal lands. But he hasn’t done any of these. Other reactions from top Democrats were equally pathetic.  

Democrat speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, responded to the news by reading out a poem. And Michigan congressman, Andy Levin, posted pictures of himself doing yoga. So nobody should be fooled by the Democrats’ lies that the critical issue is the 8 November midterm elections.

The Democrats have shown they will stand by as the right tears away abortion rights. It should be no surprise that a party led by a man who can barely even utter the word “abortion” acts in this way. 

The Democrats are fixated on not upsetting sections of voters. That matters more to them than defending women’s rights.


More massive protest needed

Although the anti-choice bigots are on the offensive, there is a mood to fight back for abortion rights. Big and angry mobilisations gathered just hours after the Roe announcement.

Some 20,000 people marched in New York, with many thousands taking to the streets in Portland, Oregon, Los Angeles, California, and countless other cities. There were angry protests in states with some of the most restrictive laws.

For instance, thousands of people gathered in Salt Lake City, Utah, where the state government wants a near ban on a woman’s right to choose. The visceral rage of working class people comes as a counterweight to the inaction and timidity of the NGOs and organised labour movement.

Planned Parenthood said, “The #1 thing you can do right now is help protect abortion access at state level.” That can lead people down the dead end of focusing on elections.

This is also partly why protests aren’t bigger currently. The reliance on elections and the courts often leads people to believe their rights will be protected if they vote for the right people.  The battle over abortion rights has to encompass more than just who controls the state legislature.

It’s important to fight for legal gains.  But the best way to do that is to build a large enough movement, with workers at the heart of it, that makes it impossible for the state machine to deny those demands.

Hundreds more protests are now planned, many under the “We won’t go back” slogan. They are crucial to the resistance.

BT Group workers deliver huge vote for strikes

Posted on: June 30th, 2022 by TTE No Comments
A picture of two EE workers holding CWU union signs campaigning in the BT strike ballot

EE workers in Doxford, Sunderland, campaigning in the strike vote (Picture: @CWUnews on Twitter)

Tens of thousands of telecoms workers have voted to strike in what could be the next major battle over pay. CWU union members working in BT Group—BT, Openreach and EE—all voted overwhelmingly for strikes. They are furious after bosses imposed a pay increase of £1,500 without any agreement from the union. For every worker, that’s a real terms pay cut.

The vote—in three separate ballots—shows workers in every section want to strike. In Openreach, workers voted by 95.8 percent to strike on a 74 percent turnout and in BT by 91.5 percent on a 58.2 percent turnout.

Workers in EE voted by 95 percent for strikes but fell eight votes short of meeting the 50 percent turnout threshold demanded by anti-union laws. Each result shows there’s widespread anger over pay among BT workers—and a readiness to fight.

“We always knew it was going to be a landslide in Openreach,” Eugene Caparros, a CWU rep in South Wales, told Socialist Worker. “People are outraged at the way they’ve been treated over the last couple of years. The members are still angry at not being given a pay rise last year.

“Had the company given them one maybe they could have settled this—but they’ve always got their hands in our pockets.”

And Jonathan Young, a rep in south London, Surrey and North Hampshire, told Socialist Worker, “This is massive. Our members believe that if push comes to shove they can’t afford not to go on strike. Now we have to prepare for it.”

Speaking immediately after the ballot results were announced, CWU general secretary Dave Ward slammed BT bosses for raking in profits while holding pay down. “BT posted profits earlier this year of £1.3 billion, and they also paid out £700 million to their shareholders,” he said. 

He added that BT chief executive Philip Jansen’s earnings had increased by over 32 percent to a point where he’s now earning over “3.5 million a year.” And he noted that BT had put prices up by 10 percent. “So these people are partly the cause of spiralling inflation, not workers.”

He said union leaders would demand BT bosses give workers a “substantial pay rise”—though he wouldn’t say what that would mean. Instead, he said he wanted “senior management to come back to the table.”

Ward said there wouldn’t be a “knee jerk reaction from the union”, but also said the union could call action by the end of next week. That’s if bosses didn’t confirm “they’re willing to set aside the imposition of pay and come to the table with a significantly improved offer.”

Deputy general secretary Andy Kerr added that, though BT’s pay offer “was not enough, really the biggest issue was the imposition of it.”

Eugene said that on BT’s own online platform for its employees, workers had posted with the hashtag “10 percent and nothing less.” “That’s what many people are saying,” he said. “The union won’t pick a figure because you can’t negotiate if you have hard lines set down. But we do need something in line with inflation.” He added, “The ball’s firmly in the company’s court.”

BT workers shouldn’t accept an improved offer if it’s still below inflation, even if it’s agreed with the union rather than imposed.  In a similar dispute last year, Kerr backed away from action after a deal. It put union officials “back in the room” with bosses, but which left many union activists angry.

This time there needs to be a fight—with strikes called immediately to put the pressure on bosses, not used as bargaining chips and talks. And the union should also be prepared to defy the unjust anti-union laws and call its members in EE out anyway. 

Kerr himself said that “had we balloted now” with “the two or three hundred extra members who joined in the past couple of weeks we would have got it.” “Those 200 or 300 members joined because they wanted to vote, they wanted to vote yes,” he said. 

It would be wrong if Tory anti-union laws were allowed to stop those low paid workers from fighting. Eugene said workers in South Wales were already preparing for strikes. “We’re going to have mass pickets across South Wales if action is called,” he said. “We’re just waiting for Andy Kerr to fire the starting pistol.” 

  • To keep up to date with the new mood for strikes and everything we produce, sign up for our once-a-day morning email Breakfast in Red.  Go here to register. It’s simple and free.

Mass resistance sweeps the streets of Sudan

Posted on: June 30th, 2022 by Jeandre Coetser No Comments
Image of protesters in Sudan standing by the barricades, smoke is everywhere and people have flags and safety helmets on

Protesters defying police and troops in Khartoum, Sudan (Picture: @Elmosharaf_E on Twitter)

Huge demonstrations swept Sudan on Thursday, emphasising the refusal of ordinary people to submit to the military government. And in an escalation from other recent protests, at the end of the marches people set up sit-ins in two areas of the capital Khartoum. This recalls the defiant tactics from 2019 which caused a deep crisis for the regime at that time.

The ruthless authorities responded with their habitual repression on Thursday. By 10pm activists reported that police and soldiers had killed nine people, most of them in the city of Omdurman. A sniper on the rooftop of The Holy Quran University in Omdurman fired live ammunition at marchers.

In Khartoum, security forces fired tear gas and water cannons to block protesters from moving towards the presidential palace. But that didn’t stop the marches. In Bahri, north of Khartoum, people forced their way across the Al Mak Nimer bridge and pushed back cops and troops.

Amd later the sit-ins began at Al Muassasa and Bashdar. Initially, these were declared for 24 hours, but were subject to extension depending on the participants’ votes.

Earlier, protesters barricaded some of the capital’s main thoroughfares with stones and burning tyres. Workers at Sudan’s two private sector telecoms companies said authorities had ordered them to shut down the internet throughout Thursday.

Sudan’s Radio Dabanga reported demonstrations in Nyala and Zalingei in Darfur, Kadugli in South Kordofan, El Gedaref and Kassala in eastern Sudan, and Dongola and Atbara in northern Sudan. In Port Sudan in Red Sea state, demonstrations faced repression and tear gas.

Sudanese people have fought bravely for eight months since general Abdel Fattah al‑Burhan seized power on 25 October last year. The coup ended a supposed transition towards democracy. It also put an end to a fake “power-sharing deal” between the military and civilian leaders.

Thursday was a significant date because on 30 June 1989 Omar al-Bashir led a military coup and overthrew the elected government. He ruled for nearly 30 years until 2019 when a mass movement drove him out, triggering an extended process of revolt and revolution.

Networks of resistance committees—local democratic structures that bring together activists and organise defiance of the military—organised the marches.

“We will use this day to rededicate ourselves to the process of people’s revolution,” a Sharg Al Nil Janub Coordination member in Khartoum told Socialist Worker.

The Khartoum State Resistance Committees Coordination said it hoped the marches would be “a powerful storm that overthrows the coup authority’s repressive hold on power”. “We will go out and refuse to return or renounce our duty until the coup is overthrown,” it said. “This is an open battle with them until we prevail.

“Either we achieve our objectives or perish trying. We shall accomplish what we are set out to do, despite the opposition of every traitor, coward, and slacker. And we will employ all peaceful means, such as protests, strikes, disobedience, and barricades.”

Protesters are demanding the overthrow of the regime, a civilian government and a democratic transformation.

One reason the military does not want to relinquish power is that they control large parts of the economy. A report this week from the Centre for Advanced Defence Studies (C4ADS) produced a database of 408 commercial entities controlled by security elites. They include agricultural conglomerates, banks, and medical import companies.

C4ADS is headed by figures linked to the US military establishment. It knows where the money flows in Sudan. The report said that the family of the infamously brutal Rapid Support Forces leader Mohamad Hamdan Dagalo controls over 28 percent of the shares in the major Khaleej Bank. He also has many other holdings.

Those who took to the streets on Thursday have shown immense courage and determination. But those qualities alone will not defeat the ruthless regime.

The resistance committees have to become not just protest bodies, but the centre of an alternative government to the generals and their supporters. That has to be linked to building strikes in the best-organised sections of workers—telecom, transport, finance, port workers and public services such as hospitals, schools and universities.

Recent teachers’ strikes have won real gains over pay and conditions. And 18 teachers’ committees declared they would join the 30 June demonstrations.

There are debates among the resistance committees over core issues. The Revolutionary Charter for People’s Power, adopted by resistance committees in 15 states, includes a roadmap to form a government. This would start with the selection of local councils in a process that would start immediately as part of the resistance against the coup.

But it also restricts itself to a public-private economic system which would leave much of the present wealth structure intact. The revolution has to go deeper and organise to overthrow the regime and its economic backers.

  • To keep up to date with international news and everything we produce, sign up for our once-a-day morning email Breakfast in Red.  Go here to register. It’s simple and free.

Timeline of revolution

December 2018: A trebling in the price of bread and other basic goods leads to protests. They quickly became a political revolt against the regime of Omar al-Bashir who had ruled for 30 years since a military coup. Despite repression, protests grow during the next three months.

April 2019: Instead of leaving at the end of a march in Khartoum, protesters occupied the area around the military headquarters and began an indefinite sit-in. They set up barricades to protect themselves from attack, organised food, water and security, began cultural projects and held constant discussions. The example spread to some other cities. And workers began to protest not just as individuals but as organised groups from workplaces.

11 April 2019: Fearing the scale of the protests, the military leaders announce that Bashir has been removed. But the military stay in charge. The protests and sit-ins continue and on 28 and 29 May workers hold a powerful general strike.

3 June 2019: Led by the notorious Rapid Support Forces paramilitaries, military council forces stormed the Khartoum sit-in and killed at least 110 people. But protests and strikes continue.

August 2019: Instead of building on the protests to sweep away the military, a rotten agreement sees “power-sharing” between the military and the pro-democracy movement.

October 2019: Huge numbers of people come onto the streets angry at the slow pace of change and economic hardship.

July 2020: Up to a million people march “to correct the path of the revolution”.

October 2021: The transitional agreement says the military should step aside, but they launch a coup to stay in power. It’s met by immediate street protests.

6 Nov 2021: A million people demonstrate across Sudan against the military. They block roads and make clear they will not accept military control.

21 Nov 2021: Abdalla Hamdok, the ousted civilian prime minister, does a deal with general Abdel Fattah al-Burhan to lead a government of technocrats for a transitional period. Most of the anti-coup opposition denounce the move as a sham designed to give the appearance of change while the military effectively stays in charge.

2 January 2022: Continuing mass street protests force Hamdok’s resignation. The United Nations and Western powers continue to seek a compromise between the people on the streets and the generals.

  • Send a solidarity message to the Resistance Committees here 
  • Hear Muzan Alneel, Anne Alexander and Hossam el-Hamalawy speak on the Sudanese and Middle East revolutions at Marxism 2022, 1-3 July, London. Details here

Nato summit ramps up the threat of wider war

Posted on: June 30th, 2022 by Jeandre Coetser No Comments
world leaders from turkey, findland and sweden are shaking hands at Nato summit in Madrid

Turkey, Finland and Sweden sign agreement paving the way for more Nato alliances (Picture: Nato)

The declaration from the Nato summit in Madrid has paved the way for more death and destruction in Ukraine—and the threat of wider war. The warmongers’ alliance laid out a “blue print” for a “more competitive world” on Wednesday with the biggest military build-up since the end of the Cold War.

The Nato leaders agreed more arms for Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, who spoke to the summit. This means a ramping up of the proxy war that US imperialism and Russian imperialism are waging over Ukraine.

Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg boasted about “a fundamental shift to our deterrence and defence” in the new Strategic Concept. He promised “more forward deployed combat formations”, “more high-readiness forces” and “more prepositioned equipment”.

President Joe Biden had already pledged the US will pour military equipment into Europe. This will include a permanent headquarters for the 5th Army Corps in Poland, 5,000 more troops in Romania and two F-35 squadrons in Britain.

It will send air defence equipment in Italy and Germany and increase the number of naval destroyers in Spain from four to six.

The new US deployments come on top of the 100,000 troops it has in Europe—which it had already increased by 20,000 since the Russian invasion. And, beyond just the US, its allies will increase the number of troops on high alert from 40,000 to 300,000.

At the summit Nato leaders agreed that they will invite Finland and Sweden—until now officially neutral countries—to join the alliance.

This involved a filthy deal with the Turkish regime of Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Wednesday. In return for Turkey dropping its block on the two countries joining, they will clamp down on Kurdish political exiles who’ve faced Turkish repression.

The agreement will see Sweden and Finland “address Turkey’s pending deportation or extradition requests of terror suspects”—supporters of the Kurdish nationalist PKK and YPG groups.

Finland and Sweden joining Nato is another sign of how the world is being forced into rival imperialist camps, the US and Russia and China. They are armed with nuclear weapons—and confront one another across eastern Europe and Asia.

Supporters of Nato paint it as a defensive and democratic alliance. The Strategic Concept talks of taking on Russia and China that “undercut the rules-based international order counter to our values and interests”.

In reality, it’s about US imperialism trying to defend its murderous hegemony in the face of competition from Russia and mainly China.

An article on Nato’s website ahead of the summit made clear it was about increasing rivalry between “great powers”. It said that the new Strategic Concept would “prepare the alliance for a world characterised by the return of inter-state threats and great power competition”. It explained this marked a step change from its focus on “non-peer competitors” in the 1990s and 2000s—when the US launched brutal wars against weaker countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq.

As the US and Nato ramp up imperialist competition, it’s all the more important to build an anti-war movement that rejects all the imperialists. In Britain that means demanding Russian troops withdraw from Ukraine—and opposing the US and Nato escalation and expansion.

Israeli government collapse is rooted in the racist state’s foundations

Posted on: June 29th, 2022 by Jeandre Coetser No Comments
Image of Israeli president Bennett at a meeting with US leaders

Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett  (Picture: James K. Lee)

Israel’s government has collapsed. The occupation of Palestine—and the very existence of the Israeli state itself—are at the heart of the crisis.

Right wing prime minister Naftali Bennett was forced to dissolve his government on Wednesday. He failed in his attempt to renew a law that extends Israeli civilian rule to its citizens in West Bank settlements.

The law was a cornerstone of Israel’s apartheid system as it privileges Israeli settlers over West Bank Palestinians, who live under military rule. Every Israeli government—and most Israeli parties—have voted to renew it every five years ever since Israel invaded and occupied the West Bank in 1967.

But Bennett’s government narrowly lost the renewal vote on its first reading in June—and looked set to lose a further vote on Friday. That would have left more than 475,000 Israelis in West Bank settlements living under the same military law as Palestinians. Rather than risk that, Bennett chose instead to dissolve the government. 

For most Israeli politicians, this had nothing to do with principle or opposition to settlements. The bill would have passed if it wasn’t for the viciously right wing opposition led by former prime minister, racist warmonger Binyamin Netanyahu.

As prime minister, Netanyahu championed settlements in the West Bank. He didn’t want to end them—but to prove that Bennett’s government can’t manage the occupation. That’s a fundamental question that strikes at the very existence of the Israeli state—and is at the root of Israel’s political crisis. 

Israel’s settlement-building campaign is designed to claim Palestinian land—with a view to eventually annexing it—and deny Palestinians the hope of any kind of state. But annexing Palestinian land also means more Palestinians living inside Israel’s border. The prospect of this is an existential crisis for a state premised on maintaining a clear ethnic majority over Arabs.

Every Israeli government has had to face up to this contradiction—and none has found an answer.  Bennett’s coalition government replaced Netanyahu a year ago this month. It ended a two-year-long stalemate in which four elections had failed to produce a government.

The one thing that every party in Bennett’s coalition agreed on—“left” and right—is that Netanyahu could no longer manage the occupation. He is bogged down in multiple corruption scandals. But—more importantly—last year’s Palestinian revolt had rocked Israeli society.

Yet those parties were also split on how to manage the occupation and preserve Israel as a “Jewish” state. Some of them are so-called “centrist” or “left” parties who think a commitment to some sort of Palestinian state is the best way to keep Arabs out of Israel.

Others—such as Bennett—want to annexe the whole of the West Bank. They were also divided on what Israel’s “Jewish identity” should mean. Some are secular and want to end privileges enjoyed by Israel’s orthodox minority, while others are deeply religious.

That left Bennett’s coalition fragile and vulnerable to splits—and Israel’s political system mired in repeated elections and stalemates. The only near certainty is that any outcome will likely mean intensified repression of Palestinians. 

Bennett and Netanyahu are committed to never letting go of Palestinian land. Their answer is to do their best—through settlement building and violent repression—to force Palestinians into ever smaller enclaves.

Israeli mainstream politics once denied the crisis had anything to do with the occupation. But now the truth is coming to the fore—it’s about a racist state that can’t exist without oppressing Palestinians.

Keep up solidarity with the GMB Three arrested trade unionists

Posted on: June 29th, 2022 by Jeandre Coetser No Comments
Crowd of GMB strikers and other people outside a court house stand there in solidarity with banners, flags and placards

Crowds join the “GMB Three” bin strikers outside Hastings Magistrates Court in solidarity (Picture: Jenny Sutton)

Trade unionists have vowed to keep up solidarity with the “GMB Three” after their first day in court on Friday. The three GMB union officials were arrested on a bin strikers’ picket line at the Amberstone depot in Wealden, East Sussex, in May.

Around 50 people protested outside Hastings magistrates court in solidarity with Gary Palmer, Carl Turner and Declan McIntyre. Their case will go to full trial at Brighton Crown Court on 16 November after all three pleaded not guilty on charges of obstruction of a highway.

Palmer said, “We are pleading not guilty. Why would we do anything else? We’ve not broken any law. And if we have, it’s been unfairly imposed on trade unionists. We will continue to organise, we will push for workers who need a pay rise to mount industrial action. The fight never stops.” 

Simon Hester, chair of Hastings and District trades union council, was at the pickets at the time of the arrests. He told Socialist Worker he thought the police had made a “political” decision to arrest trade union activists. 

“I asked the police why they were making their arrests on the day, and they said because ‘public opinion’ had changed. I then asked how they got to decide where public opinion is—the police officer quickly stopped talking to me after that.

“But what’s clear is this attack on these trade unionists is an attack on pickets and the right to strike.” 

It’s vital everyone defends the right to strike and picket as the cost of living crisis deepens. Justin Bowden, GMB regional secretary, said, “The background to this court case is really simple. It was about ordinary people facing a cost of living crisis unprecedented in my working life. 

“They were standing up against an employer and trying to get better pay to support their families. A lot of these people were being paid under £10 an hour for walking 15 to 20 miles a day. They made a democratic decision and they struck.”

The bin workers have since returned to work after accepting a new pay deal from outsourcer Biffa. 

The GMB Three case is a chilling example of how the Tories have emboldened the police to clamp down on working class people taking a stand. Socialists, trade unionists and campaigners should show their support for the GMB Three.

Sturgeon sets a date—but courts won’t win an independence referendum

Posted on: June 28th, 2022 by Charlie No Comments
Nicola Sturgeon behind a speaker's podium

Nicola Sturgeon says she wants an independence referendum (Picture: Scottish government on Flickr)

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon addressed the Scottish parliament on Tuesday to set out the route to a second independence referendum that could break up the British state. She named 19 October next year as the date for a vote—but very serious doubts remain on how this will happen.

Sturgeon said, “Now is the time for independence”, and added that respect for “democracy” but also for “the rule of law” will underpin the Scottish National Party’s (SNP) approach to it. She reasserted her preference would be the Westminster government granting permission for a referendum via a Section 30 order, which Tory governments have refused on two previous occasions.

Sturgeon said, “I will not allow Scottish democracy to be a prisoner of Boris Johnson.” She announced her wish to hold a fresh “consultative” vote—like the Brexit vote in 2016— asking the same question as the 2014 referendum on independence.

Immediately Sturgeon added that the Scottish government’s power to hold such a referendum was contested. If the Scottish parliament tabled the bill, it would almost certainly immediately be obstructed in the courts by the British government and through individual legal challenges.

To overcome this, Sturgeon explained she has asked Scotland’s top judge to refer the bill to the Supreme Court.

Sturgeon conceded the Supreme Court might block the referendum. If that happened, she said the SNP would fight the next general election on the single question of whether Scotland should become an independent country. She said the election would be a “de facto referendum”.

The indyref, if blocked and not held, becomes the reason to vote SNP in 2024. And that still won’t guarantee independence. While the Tories are weak and there is a rise in resistance, a real push for independence could accelerate the crisis of the British state and the unravelling of Johnson’s government. 

The problem is the SNP’s strategy continues to rely solely on the courts and parliament. It rests on the assumption that the British state, the judiciary or international institutions are neutral and will eventually accept the democratic case for independence. 

Independence supporters that have organised on the ground or participated in marches don’t have any role to play. Sturgeon added that if the British government blocked a referendum this would expose any notion of the UK as a voluntary union of nations. The right to a referendum is a basic democratic question. But the question is what is the SNP going to do to make this a reality when the British state deploys every mechanism at its disposal to stop one.

A mass movement, on a bigger scale than what have seen so far and independent from the SNP and its politics, could push back against the Tories and make indyref2 a reality.

This would mean breaking with nationalism and linking independence to the key issues affecting workers now. But the left should not allow Scottish politics for the next year to become dominated by waiting for a referendum while ordinary people are mere spectators. The agitation against climate change, the resistance to racism and deportations and the rail workers’ strikes have shown we can fight now.

Borders kill—dozens of migrants suffocated in San Antonio, Texas

Posted on: June 28th, 2022 by Nick No Comments
A border patrol guard in Texas, in a uniform reading CPB Border Patrol federal agent

Border guards stop safe entry to Texas

There was horror on the US border as at least 46 people were found dead inside a tractor-trailer in San Antonio, Texas, on Monday. The terrible discovery was made by a worker who heard cries for help coming from inside the trailer and found a pile of bodies inside.

In a desperate attempt to cross the border, migrants got onto a truck with no air conditioning and no water in the sweltering Texas heat. A further 16 people, including four children, were taken to hospital after suffering heat stroke and heat exhaustion.

Democratic politician and candidate for governor of Texas Beto O’Rourke called for action to “dismantle human smuggling rings”. But the blood is on the hands of the US state and its border controls.

The number of people attempting to cross the border irregularly has risen to the highest levels in more than a decade this year. Border forces said in March this year they expected 18,000 encounters with migrants a day.

While increasing numbers of migrants are risking their lives to get to the US, the options for safe routes across the border are basically non-existent. Despite the promises president Joe Biden made during his election campaign, immigration policy has changed little since the presidency of Donald Trump.

The public health order known as Title 42, which the Trump administration first used to expel migrants, is still in use. The order sends migrants back with no chance to apply for asylum. Often this leads to migrants repeatedly making attempts to cross the border.

During Biden’s presidency, this policy has turned away at least a million people. The policy director at the American Immigration Council, Aaron Reichlin‑Melnick, said policies like these only result in tragedy.

“With the border shut as tightly as it is today for migrants from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, people have been pushed into more and more dangerous routes,” he posted on Twitter. “Truck smuggling is way up.”

In just one year ending last September, US Customs and Border Protection reported 557 deaths on the southwest border alone, including in Texas. The actual number is likely to be even higher.

US border controls kill hundreds, if not thousands, a year. The same horror that refugees and migrants face in Texas repeats itself worldwide.

There were furious protests after Moroccan security forces, working with the Spanish National Police and the Civil Guard, massacred at least 37 people in Melilla in north Africa. In Britain the Tories are still pushing their deadly scheme to send refugees to Rwanda

On 19 July Care4Calais and the PCS union will be in court, fighting to make the Rwanda deportation plan unlawful. The battle inside the courts must come alongside furious demonstrations outside of it. Border controls kill.

  • Demonstrate, Tue 19 July, 9am onwards, rally 1-2pm, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL. For details go to bit.ly/Rwanda19July